GMF vs MZL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMF (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZL (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GMF | MZL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.69% | −0.97% | 0.00% |
| 1 week | −2.29% | −0.03% | −0.18% |
| 1 month | −4.33% | −1.02% | −1.21% |
| 3 months | 13.09% | 5.23% | 6.24% |
| 6 months | 2.06% | 12.04% | 13.40% |
| YTD | −2.28% | 22.89% | 22.20% |
| 1 year | 57.41% | 33.77% | 35.20% |
| 3 years | — | 194.36% | 174.60% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GMF vs MZL comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GMF (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZL (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. İkinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GMF leads in 5 and MZL leads in 5. GMF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; MZL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GMF leads (0.69% vs −0.97%). 1 week: MZL leads (−0.03% vs −2.29%). 1 month: MZL leads (−1.02% vs −4.33%). 3 months: GMF leads (13.09% vs 5.23%). 6 months: MZL leads (12.04% vs 2.06%). YTD: MZL leads (22.89% vs −2.28%). 1 year: GMF leads (57.41% vs 33.77%). Size (TRY): GMF leads (19.5B vs 8.3B). Investors: GMF leads (174,452 vs 152,047). Risk: MZL leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GMF or MZL?
Year to date GMF returned −2.28% and MZL returned 22.89%; over the last year GMF returned 57.41% and MZL returned 33.77%. Over the last month GMF returned −4.33% and MZL returned −1.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GMF or MZL?
As of September 28, 2026, GMF has a size of TRY 19.5B with 174,452 investors, while MZL has a size of TRY 8.3B with 152,047 investors. GMF leads in size and GMF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GMF and MZL mean?
The CMB risk score of GMF is 6 out of 7 and that of MZL is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.