Yatırımcı.AI

GMC vs GZP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMC (TEB Portföy Gümüs Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GMCGZP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMC vs GZP Fund Comparison
MetricGMCGZPCategory median
Daily−4.47%−0.46%−0.81%
1 week−7.60%−0.27%−1.35%
1 month−10.16%0.28%−1.46%
3 months8.63%5.95%5.43%
6 months−6.14%14.78%13.12%
YTD−11.91%24.33%21.52%
1 year49.82%35.18%34.01%
3 years325.40%214.31%172.01%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMC vs GZP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMC (TEB Portföy Gümüs Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZP (Garanti Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GMC leads in 4 and GZP leads in 7. GMC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZP leads (−0.46% vs −4.47%). 1 week: GZP leads (−0.27% vs −7.60%). 1 month: GZP leads (0.28% vs −10.16%). 3 months: GMC leads (8.63% vs 5.95%). 6 months: GZP leads (14.78% vs −6.14%). YTD: GZP leads (24.33% vs −11.91%). 1 year: GMC leads (49.82% vs 35.18%). 3 years: GMC leads (325.40% vs 214.31%). Size (TRY): GZP leads (3.8B vs 3.6B). Investors: GMC leads (19,385 vs 9,914). Risk: GZP leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMC returned −11.91% and GZP returned 24.33%; over the last year GMC returned 49.82% and GZP returned 35.18%. Over the last month GMC returned −10.16% and GZP returned 0.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GMC has a size of TRY 3.6B with 19,385 investors, while GZP has a size of TRY 3.8B with 9,914 investors. GZP leads in size and GMC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMC is 7 out of 7 and that of GZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.