Yatırımcı.AI

ARL vs GMC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ARL (Ak Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GMC (TEB Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

ARLGMC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ARL vs GMC Fund Comparison
MetricARLGMCCategory median
Daily0.35%−4.47%−0.81%
1 week0.89%−7.60%−1.35%
1 month1.74%−10.16%−1.46%
3 months6.29%8.63%5.43%
6 months13.71%−6.14%13.12%
YTD23.54%−11.91%21.52%
1 year34.03%49.82%34.01%
3 years203.19%325.40%172.01%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ARL vs GMC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ARL (Ak Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GMC (TEB Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ARL leads in 6 and GMC leads in 4. ARL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GMC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ARL leads (0.35% vs −4.47%). 1 week: ARL leads (0.89% vs −7.60%). 1 month: ARL leads (1.74% vs −10.16%). 3 months: GMC leads (8.63% vs 6.29%). 6 months: ARL leads (13.71% vs −6.14%). YTD: ARL leads (23.54% vs −11.91%). 1 year: GMC leads (49.82% vs 34.03%). 3 years: GMC leads (325.40% vs 203.19%). Size (TRY): ARL leads (3.9B vs 3.6B). Investors: GMC leads (19,385 vs 7,185).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ARL returned 23.54% and GMC returned −11.91%; over the last year ARL returned 34.03% and GMC returned 49.82%. Over the last month ARL returned 1.74% and GMC returned −10.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ARL has a size of TRY 3.9B with 7,185 investors, while GMC has a size of TRY 3.6B with 19,385 investors. ARL leads in size and GMC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ARL is — out of 7 and that of GMC is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.