GLS vs KZU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and KZU (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLS | KZU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.11% | −0.93% | −0.60% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | −1.20% | −0.86% |
| 1 month | 2.84% | −3.62% | −0.33% |
| 3 months | 9.39% | 3.71% | 4.42% |
| 6 months | 19.55% | −5.59% | 12.01% |
| YTD | 34.45% | 0.82% | 28.30% |
| 1 year | 43.77% | 5.23% | 34.68% |
| 3 years | 216.09% | 27.40% | 158.22% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLS vs KZU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and KZU (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GLS leads in 9 and KZU leads in 2. GLS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KZU is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GLS leads (0.11% vs −0.93%). 1 week: GLS leads (0.67% vs −1.20%). 1 month: GLS leads (2.84% vs −3.62%). 3 months: GLS leads (9.39% vs 3.71%). 6 months: GLS leads (19.55% vs −5.59%). YTD: GLS leads (34.45% vs 0.82%). 1 year: GLS leads (43.77% vs 5.23%). 3 years: GLS leads (216.09% vs 27.40%). Size (TRY): KZU leads (402.2M vs 338.9M). Investors: KZU leads (5,366 vs 1,354). Risk: GLS leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GLS or KZU?
Year to date GLS returned 34.45% and KZU returned 0.82%; over the last year GLS returned 43.77% and KZU returned 5.23%. Over the last month GLS returned 2.84% and KZU returned −3.62%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLS or KZU?
As of October 23, 2026, GLS has a size of TRY 338.9M with 1,354 investors, while KZU has a size of TRY 402.2M with 5,366 investors. KZU leads in size and KZU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLS and KZU mean?
The CMB risk score of GLS is 2 out of 7 and that of KZU is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.