FIB vs RPG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIB (Fiba Portföy Altın Fonu) and RPG (Rota Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIB | RPG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.99% | −0.83% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | 0.79% | 0.41% | 0.74% |
| 1 month | −1.25% | −1.88% | −1.26% |
| 3 months | −2.49% | −3.73% | −2.52% |
| 6 months | −4.86% | −4.59% | −4.66% |
| YTD | 3.82% | 5.59% | 4.61% |
| 1 year | 10.55% | 12.64% | 11.50% |
| 3 years | 241.47% | 235.68% | 245.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIB vs RPG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIB (Fiba Portföy Altın Fonu) and RPG (Rota Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIB leads in 6 and RPG leads in 4. FIB is a Gold Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPG is a Gold Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPG leads (−0.83% vs −0.99%). 1 week: FIB leads (0.79% vs 0.41%). 1 month: FIB leads (−1.25% vs −1.88%). 3 months: FIB leads (−2.49% vs −3.73%). 6 months: RPG leads (−4.59% vs −4.86%). YTD: RPG leads (5.59% vs 3.82%). 1 year: RPG leads (12.64% vs 10.55%). 3 years: FIB leads (241.47% vs 235.68%). Size (TRY): FIB leads (4.3B vs 819.5M). Investors: FIB leads (11,239 vs 1,202).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIB or RPG?
Year to date FIB returned 3.82% and RPG returned 5.59%; over the last year FIB returned 10.55% and RPG returned 12.64%. Over the last month FIB returned −1.25% and RPG returned −1.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIB or RPG?
As of November 12, 2026, FIB has a size of TRY 4.3B with 11,239 investors, while RPG has a size of TRY 819.5M with 1,202 investors. FIB leads in size and FIB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIB and RPG mean?
The CMB risk score of FIB is 6 out of 7 and that of RPG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.