GGJ vs GTZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GTZ (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GGJ | GTZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.71% | 0.88% | 0.00% |
| 1 week | −3.22% | −3.18% | −0.18% |
| 1 month | −5.93% | −5.02% | −1.21% |
| 3 months | 15.20% | 13.65% | 6.24% |
| 6 months | −1.85% | 0.02% | 13.40% |
| YTD | −3.59% | −3.79% | 22.20% |
| 1 year | — | 55.89% | 35.20% |
| 3 years | — | 352.36% | 174.60% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GGJ vs GTZ comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GTZ (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 3 and GTZ leads in 5. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GTZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GTZ leads (0.88% vs 0.71%). 1 week: GTZ leads (−3.18% vs −3.22%). 1 month: GTZ leads (−5.02% vs −5.93%). 3 months: GGJ leads (15.20% vs 13.65%). 6 months: GTZ leads (0.02% vs −1.85%). YTD: GGJ leads (−3.59% vs −3.79%). Size (TRY): GTZ leads (12B vs 8.5B). Investors: GGJ leads (141,575 vs 59,292).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GGJ or GTZ?
Year to date GGJ returned −3.59% and GTZ returned −3.79%; over the last year GGJ returned — and GTZ returned 55.89%. Over the last month GGJ returned −5.93% and GTZ returned −5.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GGJ or GTZ?
As of September 28, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 8.5B with 141,575 investors, while GTZ has a size of TRY 12B with 59,292 investors. GTZ leads in size and GGJ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GGJ and GTZ mean?
The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of GTZ is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.