Yatırımcı.AI

GGJ vs YZG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YZG (Yapı Kredi Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GGJYZG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GGJ vs YZG Fund Comparison
MetricGGJYZGCategory median
Today (est.)—0.00%0.00%
Daily0.71%−1.92%0.00%
1 week−3.22%−2.02%−0.18%
1 month−5.93%−7.13%−1.21%
3 months15.20%10.53%6.24%
6 months−1.85%−0.33%13.40%
YTD−3.59%−3.25%22.20%
1 year—61.39%35.20%
3 years—342.18%174.60%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 09:52.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GGJ vs YZG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YZG (Yapı Kredi Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 4 and YZG leads in 4. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; YZG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GGJ leads (0.71% vs −1.92%). 1 week: YZG leads (−2.02% vs −3.22%). 1 month: GGJ leads (−5.93% vs −7.13%). 3 months: GGJ leads (15.20% vs 10.53%). 6 months: YZG leads (−0.33% vs −1.85%). YTD: YZG leads (−3.25% vs −3.59%). Size (TRY): YZG leads (10.3B vs 8.5B). Investors: GGJ leads (141,575 vs 57,326).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GGJ returned −3.59% and YZG returned −3.25%; over the last year GGJ returned — and YZG returned 61.39%. Over the last month GGJ returned −5.93% and YZG returned −7.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 8.5B with 141,575 investors, while YZG has a size of TRY 10.3B with 57,326 investors. YZG leads in size and GGJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of YZG is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.