Yatırımcı.AI

GGJ vs GMF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GMF (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GGJGMF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GGJ vs GMF Fund Comparison
MetricGGJGMFCategory median
Daily0.71%0.69%0.00%
1 week−3.22%−2.29%−0.18%
1 month−5.93%−4.33%−1.21%
3 months15.20%13.09%6.24%
6 months−1.85%2.06%13.40%
YTD−3.59%−2.28%22.20%
1 year—57.41%35.20%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GGJ vs GMF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GMF (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 2 and GMF leads in 7. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GMF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GGJ leads (0.71% vs 0.69%). 1 week: GMF leads (−2.29% vs −3.22%). 1 month: GMF leads (−4.33% vs −5.93%). 3 months: GGJ leads (15.20% vs 13.09%). 6 months: GMF leads (2.06% vs −1.85%). YTD: GMF leads (−2.28% vs −3.59%). Size (TRY): GMF leads (19.5B vs 8.5B). Investors: GMF leads (174,452 vs 141,575). Risk: GMF leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GGJ returned −3.59% and GMF returned −2.28%; over the last year GGJ returned — and GMF returned 57.41%. Over the last month GGJ returned −5.93% and GMF returned −4.33%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 8.5B with 141,575 investors, while GMF has a size of TRY 19.5B with 174,452 investors. GMF leads in size and GMF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of GMF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.