FTL vs KIK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FTL | KIK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.30% | 1.08% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | 2.72% | 0.41% |
| 1 month | 3.13% | 0.12% | 0.20% |
| 3 months | 9.85% | 1.44% | 8.83% |
| 6 months | 21.24% | 24.30% | 16.56% |
| YTD | 31.78% | 33.18% | 27.81% |
| 1 year | 45.31% | 40.77% | 39.52% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FTL vs KIK comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FTL leads in 5 and KIK leads in 5. FTL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KIK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KIK leads (1.08% vs 0.30%). 1 week: KIK leads (2.72% vs 0.69%). 1 month: FTL leads (3.13% vs 0.12%). 3 months: FTL leads (9.85% vs 1.44%). 6 months: KIK leads (24.30% vs 21.24%). YTD: KIK leads (33.18% vs 31.78%). 1 year: FTL leads (45.31% vs 40.77%). Size (TRY): FTL leads (160M vs 157M). Investors: KIK leads (1,292 vs 574). Risk: FTL leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FTL or KIK?
Year to date FTL returned 31.78% and KIK returned 33.18%; over the last year FTL returned 45.31% and KIK returned 40.77%. Over the last month FTL returned 3.13% and KIK returned 0.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FTL or KIK?
As of September 28, 2026, FTL has a size of TRY 160M with 574 investors, while KIK has a size of TRY 157M with 1,292 investors. FTL leads in size and KIK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FTL and KIK mean?
The CMB risk score of FTL is 1 out of 7 and that of KIK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.