Yatırımcı.AI

FSK vs PPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSK (Qnb Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

FSKPPP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FSK vs PPP Fund Comparison
MetricFSKPPPCategory median
Daily0.29%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.68%0.70%
1 month3.02%3.08%3.12%
3 months9.86%9.85%9.98%
6 months21.17%21.50%21.60%
YTD31.65%32.22%32.28%
1 year45.89%46.22%46.56%
3 years254.77%80.54%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FSK vs PPP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSK (Qnb Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSK leads in 5 and PPP leads in 5. FSK is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPP leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: FSK leads (0.69% vs 0.68%). 1 month: PPP leads (3.08% vs 3.02%). 3 months: FSK leads (9.86% vs 9.85%). 6 months: PPP leads (21.50% vs 21.17%). YTD: PPP leads (32.22% vs 31.65%). 1 year: PPP leads (46.22% vs 45.89%). 3 years: FSK leads (254.77% vs 80.54%). Size (TRY): FSK leads (5.2B vs 4.1B). Investors: FSK leads (2,563 vs 320).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FSK returned 31.65% and PPP returned 32.22%; over the last year FSK returned 45.89% and PPP returned 46.22%. Over the last month FSK returned 3.02% and PPP returned 3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FSK has a size of TRY 5.2B with 2,563 investors, while PPP has a size of TRY 4.1B with 320 investors. FSK leads in size and FSK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSK is 2 out of 7 and that of PPP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.