Yatırımcı.AI

FSK vs RPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSK (Qnb Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and RPP (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

FSKRPP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FSK vs RPP Fund Comparison
MetricFSKRPPCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.69%0.70%
1 month3.02%3.09%3.12%
3 months9.86%9.93%9.98%
6 months21.17%21.68%21.60%
YTD31.65%32.55%32.28%
1 year45.89%46.60%46.56%
3 years254.77%264.24%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FSK vs RPP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSK (Qnb Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and RPP (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSK leads in 2 and RPP leads in 8. FSK is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPP leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: FSK leads (0.69% vs 0.69%). 1 month: RPP leads (3.09% vs 3.02%). 3 months: RPP leads (9.93% vs 9.86%). 6 months: RPP leads (21.68% vs 21.17%). YTD: RPP leads (32.55% vs 31.65%). 1 year: RPP leads (46.60% vs 45.89%). 3 years: RPP leads (264.24% vs 254.77%). Size (TRY): FSK leads (5.2B vs 4.9B). Investors: RPP leads (6,022 vs 2,563).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FSK returned 31.65% and RPP returned 32.55%; over the last year FSK returned 45.89% and RPP returned 46.60%. Over the last month FSK returned 3.02% and RPP returned 3.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FSK has a size of TRY 5.2B with 2,563 investors, while RPP has a size of TRY 4.9B with 6,022 investors. FSK leads in size and RPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSK is 2 out of 7 and that of RPP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.