Yatırımcı.AI

FSF vs KVS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FSFKVS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSF vs KVS Fund Comparison
MetricFSFKVSCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.69%0.71%0.44%
1 month2.98%3.02%0.38%
3 months9.85%10.22%3.95%
6 months21.18%22.07%8.45%
YTD35.78%37.50%16.06%
1 year46.07%48.37%20.98%
3 years262.90%253.15%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSF vs KVS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSF leads in 2 and KVS leads in 8. FSF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KVS leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: KVS leads (0.71% vs 0.69%). 1 month: KVS leads (3.02% vs 2.98%). 3 months: KVS leads (10.22% vs 9.85%). 6 months: KVS leads (22.07% vs 21.18%). YTD: KVS leads (37.50% vs 35.78%). 1 year: KVS leads (48.37% vs 46.07%). 3 years: FSF leads (262.90% vs 253.15%). Size (TRY): KVS leads (12.5B vs 11.5B). Investors: FSF leads (7,422 vs 1,123).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSF returned 35.78% and KVS returned 37.50%; over the last year FSF returned 46.07% and KVS returned 48.37%. Over the last month FSF returned 2.98% and KVS returned 3.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FSF has a size of TRY 11.5B with 7,422 investors, while KVS has a size of TRY 12.5B with 1,123 investors. KVS leads in size and FSF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSF is 2 out of 7 and that of KVS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.