Yatırımcı.AI

FBI vs KVS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBI (Fiba Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FBIKVS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBI vs KVS Fund Comparison
MetricFBIKVSCategory median
Daily0.06%0.21%0.19%
1 week0.40%0.61%0.42%
1 month1.76%3.19%0.94%
3 months5.91%10.35%5.89%
6 months12.07%22.56%12.86%
YTD16.65%33.87%18.07%
1 year21.66%48.53%24.44%
3 years98.45%253.03%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBI vs KVS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBI (Fiba Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBI leads in 2 and KVS leads in 9. FBI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KVS leads (0.21% vs 0.06%). 1 week: KVS leads (0.61% vs 0.40%). 1 month: KVS leads (3.19% vs 1.76%). 3 months: KVS leads (10.35% vs 5.91%). 6 months: KVS leads (22.56% vs 12.07%). YTD: KVS leads (33.87% vs 16.65%). 1 year: KVS leads (48.53% vs 21.66%). 3 years: KVS leads (253.03% vs 98.45%). Size (TRY): KVS leads (16.1B vs 15.7B). Investors: FBI leads (4,772 vs 2,007). Risk: FBI leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBI returned 16.65% and KVS returned 33.87%; over the last year FBI returned 21.66% and KVS returned 48.53%. Over the last month FBI returned 1.76% and KVS returned 3.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FBI has a size of TRY 15.7B with 4,772 investors, while KVS has a size of TRY 16.1B with 2,007 investors. KVS leads in size and FBI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBI is 0 out of 7 and that of KVS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.