Yatırımcı.AI

FSF vs IDF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and IDF (İş Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FSFIDF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSF vs IDF Fund Comparison
MetricFSFIDFCategory median
Daily0.29%0.25%0.19%
1 week0.69%0.41%0.42%
1 month3.17%1.13%0.94%
3 months10.03%5.44%5.89%
6 months21.66%12.99%12.86%
YTD32.36%16.48%18.07%
1 year46.26%23.49%24.44%
3 years263.45%124.28%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSF vs IDF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and IDF (İş Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FSF leads in 10 and IDF leads in 1. FSF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSF leads (0.29% vs 0.25%). 1 week: FSF leads (0.69% vs 0.41%). 1 month: FSF leads (3.17% vs 1.13%). 3 months: FSF leads (10.03% vs 5.44%). 6 months: FSF leads (21.66% vs 12.99%). YTD: FSF leads (32.36% vs 16.48%). 1 year: FSF leads (46.26% vs 23.49%). 3 years: FSF leads (263.45% vs 124.28%). Size (TRY): FSF leads (13.7B vs 12.4B). Investors: FSF leads (7,756 vs 4,125). Risk: IDF leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSF returned 32.36% and IDF returned 16.48%; over the last year FSF returned 46.26% and IDF returned 23.49%. Over the last month FSF returned 3.17% and IDF returned 1.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FSF has a size of TRY 13.7B with 7,756 investors, while IDF has a size of TRY 12.4B with 4,125 investors. FSF leads in size and FSF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSF is 2 out of 7 and that of IDF is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.