Yatırımcı.AI

FPZ vs ONS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPZ (Qnb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ONS (İş Portföy Onikinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FPZONS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FPZ vs ONS Fund Comparison
MetricFPZONSCategory median
Daily0.08%0.08%0.19%
1 week0.44%0.45%0.42%
1 month1.85%1.91%0.94%
3 months5.95%6.12%5.89%
6 months12.11%12.33%12.86%
YTD16.82%16.99%18.07%
1 year22.00%22.16%24.44%
3 years103.31%99.85%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FPZ vs ONS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FPZ (Qnb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ONS (İş Portföy Onikinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPZ leads in 1 and ONS leads in 9. FPZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ONS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ONS leads (0.08% vs 0.08%). 1 week: ONS leads (0.45% vs 0.44%). 1 month: ONS leads (1.91% vs 1.85%). 3 months: ONS leads (6.12% vs 5.95%). 6 months: ONS leads (12.33% vs 12.11%). YTD: ONS leads (16.99% vs 16.82%). 1 year: ONS leads (22.16% vs 22.00%). 3 years: FPZ leads (103.31% vs 99.85%). Size (TRY): ONS leads (168.8B vs 134.8B). Investors: ONS leads (23,623 vs 19,215).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FPZ returned 16.82% and ONS returned 16.99%; over the last year FPZ returned 22.00% and ONS returned 22.16%. Over the last month FPZ returned 1.85% and ONS returned 1.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FPZ has a size of TRY 134.8B with 19,215 investors, while ONS has a size of TRY 168.8B with 23,623 investors. ONS leads in size and ONS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FPZ is 0 out of 7 and that of ONS is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.