Yatırımcı.AI

FPZ vs GRO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPZ (Qnb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and GRO (Garanti Portföy Otuzuncu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FPZGRO
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FPZ vs GRO Fund Comparison
MetricFPZGROCategory median
Daily0.08%0.08%0.19%
1 week0.44%0.45%0.42%
1 month1.85%1.86%0.94%
3 months5.95%6.02%5.89%
6 months12.11%12.24%12.86%
YTD16.82%16.85%18.07%
1 year22.00%22.09%24.44%
3 years103.31%101.35%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FPZ vs GRO comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FPZ (Qnb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and GRO (Garanti Portföy Otuzuncu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPZ leads in 2 and GRO leads in 8. FPZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GRO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FPZ leads (0.08% vs 0.08%). 1 week: GRO leads (0.45% vs 0.44%). 1 month: GRO leads (1.86% vs 1.85%). 3 months: GRO leads (6.02% vs 5.95%). 6 months: GRO leads (12.24% vs 12.11%). YTD: GRO leads (16.85% vs 16.82%). 1 year: GRO leads (22.09% vs 22.00%). 3 years: FPZ leads (103.31% vs 101.35%). Size (TRY): GRO leads (190.7B vs 134.8B). Investors: GRO leads (26,867 vs 19,215).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FPZ returned 16.82% and GRO returned 16.85%; over the last year FPZ returned 22.00% and GRO returned 22.09%. Over the last month FPZ returned 1.85% and GRO returned 1.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FPZ has a size of TRY 134.8B with 19,215 investors, while GRO has a size of TRY 190.7B with 26,867 investors. GRO leads in size and GRO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FPZ is 0 out of 7 and that of GRO is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.