FPG vs IRB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and IRB (İstanbul Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FPG | IRB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.53% | −1.90% |
| Daily | 0.31% | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −3.67% | 0.74% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.42% | 2.44% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 14.74% | 9.05% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 0.02% | 21.19% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −2.96% | 34.72% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 54.49% | — | 24.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FPG vs IRB comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and IRB (İstanbul Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FPG leads in 4 and IRB leads in 5. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IRB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FPG leads (0.31% vs 0.20%). 1 week: IRB leads (0.74% vs −3.67%). 1 month: IRB leads (2.44% vs −5.42%). 3 months: FPG leads (14.74% vs 9.05%). 6 months: IRB leads (21.19% vs 0.02%). YTD: IRB leads (34.72% vs −2.96%). Size (TRY): FPG leads (779.1M vs 650.3M). Investors: FPG leads (1,905 vs 482). Risk: IRB leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FPG or IRB?
Year to date FPG returned −2.96% and IRB returned 34.72%; over the last year FPG returned 54.49% and IRB returned —. Over the last month FPG returned −5.42% and IRB returned 2.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPG or IRB?
As of September 28, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 779.1M with 1,905 investors, while IRB has a size of TRY 650.3M with 482 investors. FPG leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPG and IRB mean?
The CMB risk score of FPG is 6 out of 7 and that of IRB is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.