FPG vs IIN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and IIN (Inveo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FPG | IIN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.19% | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −0.35% | 0.70% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −13.56% | 3.08% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −2.22% | 10.49% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −21.92% | 22.37% | 8.18% |
| YTD | −15.74% | 37.91% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 28.32% | 48.92% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FPG vs IIN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and IIN (Inveo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPG leads in 1 and IIN leads in 9. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IIN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IIN leads (0.10% vs −2.19%). 1 week: IIN leads (0.70% vs −0.35%). 1 month: IIN leads (3.08% vs −13.56%). 3 months: IIN leads (10.49% vs −2.22%). 6 months: IIN leads (22.37% vs −21.92%). YTD: IIN leads (37.91% vs −15.74%). 1 year: IIN leads (48.92% vs 28.32%). Size (TRY): IIN leads (795M vs 682.6M). Investors: FPG leads (1,800 vs 69). Risk: IIN leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FPG or IIN?
Year to date FPG returned −15.74% and IIN returned 37.91%; over the last year FPG returned 28.32% and IIN returned 48.92%. Over the last month FPG returned −13.56% and IIN returned 3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPG or IIN?
As of October 23, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 682.6M with 1,800 investors, while IIN has a size of TRY 795M with 69 investors. IIN leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPG and IIN mean?
The CMB risk score of FPG is 7 out of 7 and that of IIN is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.