Yatırımcı.AI

FOA vs IRF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FOA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FOAIRF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FOA vs IRF Fund Comparison
MetricFOAIRFCategory median
Daily0.36%0.17%0.38%
1 week0.50%0.23%0.25%
1 month0.48%1.62%−1.05%
3 months7.55%10.59%6.44%
6 months18.46%26.03%13.81%
YTD33.04%38.93%22.40%
1 year44.65%58.64%35.81%
3 years—214.47%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FOA vs IRF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FOA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FOA leads in 3 and IRF leads in 7. FOA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; IRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FOA leads (0.36% vs 0.17%). 1 week: FOA leads (0.50% vs 0.23%). 1 month: IRF leads (1.62% vs 0.48%). 3 months: IRF leads (10.59% vs 7.55%). 6 months: IRF leads (26.03% vs 18.46%). YTD: IRF leads (38.93% vs 33.04%). 1 year: IRF leads (58.64% vs 44.65%). Size (TRY): IRF leads (403.8M vs 380.5M). Investors: FOA leads (4,273 vs 1,554). Risk: IRF leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FOA returned 33.04% and IRF returned 38.93%; over the last year FOA returned 44.65% and IRF returned 58.64%. Over the last month FOA returned 0.48% and IRF returned 1.62%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FOA has a size of TRY 380.5M with 4,273 investors, while IRF has a size of TRY 403.8M with 1,554 investors. IRF leads in size and FOA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FOA is 4 out of 7 and that of IRF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.