Yatırımcı.AI

IPG vs PIL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PIL (Rota Portföy Pil Teknolojileri ve Enerji Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

IPGPIL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IPG vs PIL Fund Comparison
MetricIPGPILCategory median
Daily0.18%0.70%0.39%
1 week0.40%−0.46%0.25%
1 month0.83%−4.16%−1.05%
3 months5.00%−2.22%6.44%
6 months11.88%9.10%13.81%
YTD15.54%23.40%22.40%
1 year29.15%52.79%35.81%
3 years160.05%197.09%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IPG vs PIL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PIL (Rota Portföy Pil Teknolojileri ve Enerji Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IPG leads in 6 and PIL leads in 5. IPG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PIL is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PIL leads (0.70% vs 0.18%). 1 week: IPG leads (0.40% vs −0.46%). 1 month: IPG leads (0.83% vs −4.16%). 3 months: IPG leads (5.00% vs −2.22%). 6 months: IPG leads (11.88% vs 9.10%). YTD: PIL leads (23.40% vs 15.54%). 1 year: PIL leads (52.79% vs 29.15%). 3 years: PIL leads (197.09% vs 160.05%). Size (TRY): IPG leads (352.5M vs 339.9M). Investors: PIL leads (6,421 vs 1,653). Risk: IPG leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IPG returned 15.54% and PIL returned 23.40%; over the last year IPG returned 29.15% and PIL returned 52.79%. Over the last month IPG returned 0.83% and PIL returned −4.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IPG has a size of TRY 352.5M with 1,653 investors, while PIL has a size of TRY 339.9M with 6,421 investors. IPG leads in size and PIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IPG is 5 out of 7 and that of PIL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.