Yatırımcı.AI

IPG vs OLE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OLE (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

IPGOLE
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IPG vs OLE Fund Comparison
MetricIPGOLECategory median
Daily0.18%0.29%0.39%
1 week0.40%0.69%0.25%
1 month0.83%3.16%−1.05%
3 months5.00%10.05%6.44%
6 months11.88%22.23%13.81%
YTD15.54%33.56%22.40%
1 year29.15%47.95%35.81%
3 years160.05%255.62%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IPG vs OLE Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OLE (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IPG leads in 2 and OLE leads in 9. IPG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OLE is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OLE leads (0.29% vs 0.18%). 1 week: OLE leads (0.69% vs 0.40%). 1 month: OLE leads (3.16% vs 0.83%). 3 months: OLE leads (10.05% vs 5.00%). 6 months: OLE leads (22.23% vs 11.88%). YTD: OLE leads (33.56% vs 15.54%). 1 year: OLE leads (47.95% vs 29.15%). 3 years: OLE leads (255.62% vs 160.05%). Size (TRY): IPG leads (352.5M vs 314M). Investors: IPG leads (1,653 vs 437). Risk: OLE leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IPG returned 15.54% and OLE returned 33.56%; over the last year IPG returned 29.15% and OLE returned 47.95%. Over the last month IPG returned 0.83% and OLE returned 3.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IPG has a size of TRY 352.5M with 1,653 investors, while OLE has a size of TRY 314M with 437 investors. IPG leads in size and IPG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IPG is 5 out of 7 and that of OLE is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.