FJZ vs GUK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJZ (Fiba Portföy Fırtına Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FJZ | GUK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.00% | 0.85% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | −0.26% | 0.72% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | 1.08% | −11.49% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | 0.39% | −14.79% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | 6.35% | −31.26% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 14.59% | −21.82% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 18.63% | 13.59% | 21.48% |
| 3 years | 117.30% | — | 105.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FJZ vs GUK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FJZ (Fiba Portföy Fırtına Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FJZ leads in 5 and GUK leads in 4. FJZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUK leads (0.85% vs 0.00%). 1 week: GUK leads (0.72% vs −0.26%). 1 month: FJZ leads (1.08% vs −11.49%). 3 months: FJZ leads (0.39% vs −14.79%). 6 months: FJZ leads (6.35% vs −31.26%). YTD: FJZ leads (14.59% vs −21.82%). 1 year: FJZ leads (18.63% vs 13.59%). Size (TRY): GUK leads (1.2B vs 1.1B). Investors: GUK leads (2,268 vs 618).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FJZ or GUK?
Year to date FJZ returned 14.59% and GUK returned −21.82%; over the last year FJZ returned 18.63% and GUK returned 13.59%. Over the last month FJZ returned 1.08% and GUK returned −11.49%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FJZ or GUK?
As of November 12, 2026, FJZ has a size of TRY 1.1B with 618 investors, while GUK has a size of TRY 1.2B with 2,268 investors. GUK leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FJZ and GUK mean?
The CMB risk score of FJZ is — out of 7 and that of GUK is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.