FJG vs MET Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJG (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Re-Pie Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FJG | MET | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.27% | −0.14% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | 0.24% | −3.20% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −14.20% | −2.35% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −18.17% | 2.78% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −6.67% | 14.40% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 5.87% | 29.77% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 10.75% | 35.35% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 174.48% | 240.96% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FJG vs MET Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FJG (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Re-Pie Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FJG leads in 4 and MET leads in 7. FJG is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MET leads (−0.14% vs −0.27%). 1 week: FJG leads (0.24% vs −3.20%). 1 month: MET leads (−2.35% vs −14.20%). 3 months: MET leads (2.78% vs −18.17%). 6 months: MET leads (14.40% vs −6.67%). YTD: MET leads (29.77% vs 5.87%). 1 year: MET leads (35.35% vs 10.75%). 3 years: MET leads (240.96% vs 174.48%). Size (TRY): FJG leads (753.5M vs 748.1M). Investors: FJG leads (6,800 vs 6,306). Risk: FJG leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FJG or MET?
Year to date FJG returned 5.87% and MET returned 29.77%; over the last year FJG returned 10.75% and MET returned 35.35%. Over the last month FJG returned −14.20% and MET returned −2.35%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FJG or MET?
As of October 22, 2026, FJG has a size of TRY 753.5M with 6,800 investors, while MET has a size of TRY 748.1M with 6,306 investors. FJG leads in size and FJG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FJG and MET mean?
The CMB risk score of FJG is 3 out of 7 and that of MET is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.