DVT vs FJG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVT (Deniz Portföy Metaverse ve Dijital Yaşam Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and FJG (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Re-Pie Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DVT | FJG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.63% | −0.27% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −3.13% | 0.24% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −4.45% | −14.20% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | 0.00% | −18.17% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 17.25% | −6.67% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 42.50% | 5.87% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 49.46% | 10.75% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 272.51% | 174.48% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DVT vs FJG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DVT (Deniz Portföy Metaverse ve Dijital Yaşam Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and FJG (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Re-Pie Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DVT leads in 8 and FJG leads in 3. DVT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FJG is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DVT leads (0.63% vs −0.27%). 1 week: FJG leads (0.24% vs −3.13%). 1 month: DVT leads (−4.45% vs −14.20%). 3 months: DVT leads (0.00% vs −18.17%). 6 months: DVT leads (17.25% vs −6.67%). YTD: DVT leads (42.50% vs 5.87%). 1 year: DVT leads (49.46% vs 10.75%). 3 years: DVT leads (272.51% vs 174.48%). Size (TRY): FJG leads (753.5M vs 753.1M). Investors: DVT leads (9,608 vs 6,800). Risk: FJG leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DVT or FJG?
Year to date DVT returned 42.50% and FJG returned 5.87%; over the last year DVT returned 49.46% and FJG returned 10.75%. Over the last month DVT returned −4.45% and FJG returned −14.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DVT or FJG?
As of October 22, 2026, DVT has a size of TRY 753.1M with 9,608 investors, while FJG has a size of TRY 753.5M with 6,800 investors. FJG leads in size and DVT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DVT and FJG mean?
The CMB risk score of DVT is 6 out of 7 and that of FJG is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.