Yatırımcı.AI

FIL vs ZBJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and ZBJ (Ziraat Portföy Başak Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

FILZBJ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FIL vs ZBJ Fund Comparison
MetricFILZBJCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.71%0.70%
1 month3.08%3.12%3.12%
3 months9.88%10.06%10.00%
6 months21.44%22.03%21.60%
YTD32.08%32.79%32.28%
1 year46.18%46.90%46.56%
3 years258.62%262.66%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FIL vs ZBJ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and ZBJ (Ziraat Portföy Başak Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIL leads in 0 and ZBJ leads in 10. FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZBJ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZBJ leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: ZBJ leads (0.71% vs 0.69%). 1 month: ZBJ leads (3.12% vs 3.08%). 3 months: ZBJ leads (10.06% vs 9.88%). 6 months: ZBJ leads (22.03% vs 21.44%). YTD: ZBJ leads (32.79% vs 32.08%). 1 year: ZBJ leads (46.90% vs 46.18%). 3 years: ZBJ leads (262.66% vs 258.62%). Size (TRY): ZBJ leads (47.4B vs 15.3B). Investors: ZBJ leads (24,047 vs 20,525).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FIL returned 32.08% and ZBJ returned 32.79%; over the last year FIL returned 46.18% and ZBJ returned 46.90%. Over the last month FIL returned 3.08% and ZBJ returned 3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FIL has a size of TRY 15.3B with 20,525 investors, while ZBJ has a size of TRY 47.4B with 24,047 investors. ZBJ leads in size and ZBJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIL is 1 out of 7 and that of ZBJ is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.