FGF vs GCS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FGF (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCS (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FGF | GCS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.07% | 0.29% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.29% | 0.61% | 0.43% |
| 1 month | 1.03% | 0.54% | 0.58% |
| 3 months | 6.35% | 5.63% | 5.61% |
| 6 months | 15.54% | 15.71% | 15.62% |
| YTD | 19.92% | 20.19% | 20.05% |
| 1 year | 29.53% | 33.92% | 32.76% |
| 3 years | 132.91% | 148.79% | 143.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FGF vs GCS comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FGF (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCS (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FGF leads in 3 and GCS leads in 8. FGF is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GCS is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GCS leads (0.29% vs 0.07%). 1 week: GCS leads (0.61% vs 0.29%). 1 month: FGF leads (1.03% vs 0.54%). 3 months: FGF leads (6.35% vs 5.63%). 6 months: GCS leads (15.71% vs 15.54%). YTD: GCS leads (20.19% vs 19.92%). 1 year: GCS leads (33.92% vs 29.53%). 3 years: GCS leads (148.79% vs 132.91%). Size (TRY): GCS leads (8.1B vs 1.2B). Investors: GCS leads (967,291 vs 189,182). Risk: FGF leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FGF or GCS?
Year to date FGF returned 19.92% and GCS returned 20.19%; over the last year FGF returned 29.53% and GCS returned 33.92%. Over the last month FGF returned 1.03% and GCS returned 0.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FGF or GCS?
As of September 28, 2026, FGF has a size of TRY 1.2B with 189,182 investors, while GCS has a size of TRY 8.1B with 967,291 investors. GCS leads in size and GCS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FGF and GCS mean?
The CMB risk score of FGF is 3 out of 7 and that of GCS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.