Yatırımcı.AI

AFH vs GCS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFH (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCS (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AFHGCS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AFH vs GCS Fund Comparison
MetricAFHGCSCategory median
Daily0.17%0.29%0.26%
1 week0.29%0.61%0.43%
1 month0.62%0.54%0.58%
3 months4.91%5.63%5.61%
6 months14.03%15.71%15.62%
YTD17.54%20.19%20.05%
1 year31.93%33.92%32.76%
3 years148.29%148.79%143.95%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AFH vs GCS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFH (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCS (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFH leads in 1 and GCS leads in 9. AFH is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GCS is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GCS leads (0.29% vs 0.17%). 1 week: GCS leads (0.61% vs 0.29%). 1 month: AFH leads (0.62% vs 0.54%). 3 months: GCS leads (5.63% vs 4.91%). 6 months: GCS leads (15.71% vs 14.03%). YTD: GCS leads (20.19% vs 17.54%). 1 year: GCS leads (33.92% vs 31.93%). 3 years: GCS leads (148.79% vs 148.29%). Size (TRY): GCS leads (8.1B vs 8.1B). Investors: GCS leads (967,291 vs 796,333).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AFH returned 17.54% and GCS returned 20.19%; over the last year AFH returned 31.93% and GCS returned 33.92%. Over the last month AFH returned 0.62% and GCS returned 0.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AFH has a size of TRY 8.1B with 796,333 investors, while GCS has a size of TRY 8.1B with 967,291 investors. GCS leads in size and GCS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFH is 4 out of 7 and that of GCS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.