Yatırımcı.AI

FOA vs HBN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FOA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HBN (HSBC Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FOAHBN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FOA vs HBN Fund Comparison
MetricFOAHBNCategory median
Daily0.31%0.18%−0.12%
1 week1.22%1.03%0.58%
1 month0.97%0.29%−1.65%
3 months3.84%2.87%−1.67%
6 months9.86%7.17%1.08%
YTD34.37%24.45%20.42%
1 year41.13%30.79%26.40%
3 years—152.63%160.09%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FOA vs HBN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FOA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HBN (HSBC Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FOA leads in 8 and HBN leads in 1. FOA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; HBN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FOA leads (0.31% vs 0.18%). 1 week: FOA leads (1.22% vs 1.03%). 1 month: FOA leads (0.97% vs 0.29%). 3 months: FOA leads (3.84% vs 2.87%). 6 months: FOA leads (9.86% vs 7.17%). YTD: FOA leads (34.37% vs 24.45%). 1 year: FOA leads (41.13% vs 30.79%). Size (TRY): HBN leads (483M vs 422.2M). Investors: FOA leads (4,897 vs 934).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FOA returned 34.37% and HBN returned 24.45%; over the last year FOA returned 41.13% and HBN returned 30.79%. Over the last month FOA returned 0.97% and HBN returned 0.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, FOA has a size of TRY 422.2M with 4,897 investors, while HBN has a size of TRY 483M with 934 investors. HBN leads in size and FOA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FOA is 4 out of 7 and that of HBN is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.