Yatırımcı.AI

FFP vs ODV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ODV (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FFPODV
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFP vs ODV Fund Comparison
MetricFFPODVCategory median
Daily−0.73%0.36%−1.16%
1 week−0.97%1.08%−1.71%
1 month−1.32%1.63%−3.74%
3 months4.14%3.73%−0.11%
6 months5.02%1.34%2.89%
YTD15.88%16.14%18.90%
1 year28.10%24.67%28.73%
3 years181.24%158.40%162.51%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFP vs ODV Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ODV (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FFP leads in 6 and ODV leads in 5. FFP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODV is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODV leads (0.36% vs −0.73%). 1 week: ODV leads (1.08% vs −0.97%). 1 month: ODV leads (1.63% vs −1.32%). 3 months: FFP leads (4.14% vs 3.73%). 6 months: FFP leads (5.02% vs 1.34%). YTD: ODV leads (16.14% vs 15.88%). 1 year: FFP leads (28.10% vs 24.67%). 3 years: FFP leads (181.24% vs 158.40%). Size (TRY): FFP leads (1.8B vs 1.5B). Investors: ODV leads (3,521 vs 2,159). Risk: FFP leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFP returned 15.88% and ODV returned 16.14%; over the last year FFP returned 28.10% and ODV returned 24.67%. Over the last month FFP returned −1.32% and ODV returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FFP has a size of TRY 1.8B with 2,159 investors, while ODV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 3,521 investors. FFP leads in size and ODV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFP is 4 out of 7 and that of ODV is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.