Yatırımcı.AI

DNM vs NZT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DNM (QNB Portföy Dinamik Dağılımlı Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

DNMNZT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DNM vs NZT Fund Comparison
MetricDNMNZTCategory median
Daily−0.94%0.10%−0.07%
1 week−1.38%0.69%−0.29%
1 month−1.52%3.27%0.00%
3 months5.63%9.97%4.33%
6 months12.58%21.06%11.90%
YTD12.39%32.35%14.97%
1 year22.44%45.94%21.27%
3 years20.45%260.48%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DNM vs NZT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DNM (QNB Portföy Dinamik Dağılımlı Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DNM leads in 1 and NZT leads in 9. DNM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.10% vs −0.94%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.69% vs −1.38%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.27% vs −1.52%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.97% vs 5.63%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.06% vs 12.58%). YTD: NZT leads (32.35% vs 12.39%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.94% vs 22.44%). 3 years: NZT leads (260.48% vs 20.45%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (1.4B vs 1.4B). Investors: DNM leads (988 vs 324).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DNM returned 12.39% and NZT returned 32.35%; over the last year DNM returned 22.44% and NZT returned 45.94%. Over the last month DNM returned −1.52% and NZT returned 3.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, DNM has a size of TRY 1.4B with 988 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 1.4B with 324 investors. NZT leads in size and DNM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DNM is — out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.