Yatırımcı.AI

FBV vs HYP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and HYP (Azimut Portföy İvme Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBVHYP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBV vs HYP Fund Comparison
MetricFBVHYPCategory median
Daily−2.63%0.09%0.01%
1 week−2.76%0.68%0.30%
1 month−9.72%3.00%0.00%
3 months−4.90%10.06%3.96%
6 months−3.69%25.50%8.18%
YTD14.11%38.76%15.73%
1 year21.04%44.78%20.69%
3 years197.90%190.86%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBV vs HYP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and HYP (Azimut Portföy İvme Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBV leads in 2 and HYP leads in 8. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HYP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HYP leads (0.09% vs −2.63%). 1 week: HYP leads (0.68% vs −2.76%). 1 month: HYP leads (3.00% vs −9.72%). 3 months: HYP leads (10.06% vs −4.90%). 6 months: HYP leads (25.50% vs −3.69%). YTD: HYP leads (38.76% vs 14.11%). 1 year: HYP leads (44.78% vs 21.04%). 3 years: FBV leads (197.90% vs 190.86%). Size (TRY): HYP leads (596.3M vs 538.9M). Investors: FBV leads (1,614 vs 58).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBV returned 14.11% and HYP returned 38.76%; over the last year FBV returned 21.04% and HYP returned 44.78%. Over the last month FBV returned −9.72% and HYP returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 538.9M with 1,614 investors, while HYP has a size of TRY 596.3M with 58 investors. HYP leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of HYP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.