Yatırımcı.AI

EVM vs GZZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) and GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.

EVMGZZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EVM vs GZZ Fund Comparison
MetricEVMGZZCategory median
Daily1.12%0.12%0.03%
1 week−1.20%1.64%0.83%
1 month−5.41%4.88%−1.16%
3 months−4.01%2.08%−0.11%
6 months−2.08%6.74%0.00%
YTD8.23%8.16%22.14%
1 year—17.49%29.37%
3 years—159.83%154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EVM vs GZZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) and GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EVM leads in 2 and GZZ leads in 7. EVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EVM leads (1.12% vs 0.12%). 1 week: GZZ leads (1.64% vs −1.20%). 1 month: GZZ leads (4.88% vs −5.41%). 3 months: GZZ leads (2.08% vs −4.01%). 6 months: GZZ leads (6.74% vs −2.08%). YTD: EVM leads (8.23% vs 8.16%). Size (TRY): GZZ leads (56.8M vs 55.2M). Investors: GZZ leads (1,105 vs 499). Risk: GZZ leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EVM returned 8.23% and GZZ returned 8.16%; over the last year EVM returned — and GZZ returned 17.49%. Over the last month EVM returned −5.41% and GZZ returned 4.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, EVM has a size of TRY 55.2M with 499 investors, while GZZ has a size of TRY 56.8M with 1,105 investors. GZZ leads in size and GZZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EVM is 6 out of 7 and that of GZZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.