EVM vs RPM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EVM | RPM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.41% | 1.60% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | 0.14% | 1.83% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −2.07% | −0.51% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | 2.02% | 0.28% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | 1.48% | 12.95% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 8.85% | 24.30% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | — | 34.12% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | — | 146.59% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EVM vs RPM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EVM leads in 2 and RPM leads in 6. EVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPM leads (1.60% vs −1.41%). 1 week: RPM leads (1.83% vs 0.14%). 1 month: RPM leads (−0.51% vs −2.07%). 3 months: EVM leads (2.02% vs 0.28%). 6 months: RPM leads (12.95% vs 1.48%). YTD: RPM leads (24.30% vs 8.85%). Size (TRY): EVM leads (57.5M vs 54.2M). Investors: RPM leads (2,184 vs 512).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EVM or RPM?
Year to date EVM returned 8.85% and RPM returned 24.30%; over the last year EVM returned — and RPM returned 34.12%. Over the last month EVM returned −2.07% and RPM returned −0.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EVM or RPM?
As of November 2, 2026, EVM has a size of TRY 57.5M with 512 investors, while RPM has a size of TRY 54.2M with 2,184 investors. EVM leads in size and RPM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EVM and RPM mean?
The CMB risk score of EVM is 6 out of 7 and that of RPM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.