Yatırımcı.AI

EST vs FEN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EST (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Oyak Portföy Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ESTFEN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

EST vs FEN Fund Comparison
MetricESTFENCategory median
Daily0.16%0.14%0.26%
1 week0.63%0.11%0.48%
1 month0.84%0.41%0.23%
3 months5.31%3.18%5.55%
6 months16.33%13.85%15.94%
YTD18.17%14.84%19.06%
1 year32.18%25.04%31.36%
3 years124.14%94.66%150.68%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the EST vs FEN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EST (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Oyak Portföy Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EST leads in 9 and FEN leads in 1. EST is a Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; FEN is a Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EST leads (0.16% vs 0.14%). 1 week: EST leads (0.63% vs 0.11%). 1 month: EST leads (0.84% vs 0.41%). 3 months: EST leads (5.31% vs 3.18%). 6 months: EST leads (16.33% vs 13.85%). YTD: EST leads (18.17% vs 14.84%). 1 year: EST leads (32.18% vs 25.04%). 3 years: EST leads (124.14% vs 94.66%). Size (TRY): EST leads (224.8M vs 48M). Investors: FEN leads (6,063 vs 5,035).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date EST returned 18.17% and FEN returned 14.84%; over the last year EST returned 32.18% and FEN returned 25.04%. Over the last month EST returned 0.84% and FEN returned 0.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, EST has a size of TRY 224.8M with 5,035 investors, while FEN has a size of TRY 48M with 6,063 investors. EST leads in size and FEN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EST is 4 out of 7 and that of FEN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.