Yatırımcı.AI

CHS vs FEN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHS (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

CHSFEN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CHS vs FEN Fund Comparison
MetricCHSFENCategory median
Daily0.28%0.30%0.24%
1 week1.84%0.91%1.45%
1 month1.78%1.56%1.43%
3 months6.08%4.93%4.90%
6 months10.93%8.37%9.43%
YTD26.09%17.84%21.67%
1 year35.44%26.59%32.41%
3 years175.86%106.02%151.60%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CHS vs FEN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHS (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHS leads in 8 and FEN leads in 2. CHS is a Standard Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; FEN is a Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FEN leads (0.30% vs 0.28%). 1 week: CHS leads (1.84% vs 0.91%). 1 month: CHS leads (1.78% vs 1.56%). 3 months: CHS leads (6.08% vs 4.93%). 6 months: CHS leads (10.93% vs 8.37%). YTD: CHS leads (26.09% vs 17.84%). 1 year: CHS leads (35.44% vs 26.59%). 3 years: CHS leads (175.86% vs 106.02%). Size (TRY): CHS leads (178.7M vs 49.2M). Investors: FEN leads (6,056 vs 3,076).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CHS returned 26.09% and FEN returned 17.84%; over the last year CHS returned 35.44% and FEN returned 26.59%. Over the last month CHS returned 1.78% and FEN returned 1.56%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, CHS has a size of TRY 178.7M with 3,076 investors, while FEN has a size of TRY 49.2M with 6,056 investors. CHS leads in size and FEN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHS is 4 out of 7 and that of FEN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.