CHS vs FEN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHS (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHS | FEN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | 0.14% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.45% | 0.11% | 0.48% |
| 1 month | 0.03% | 0.41% | 0.23% |
| 3 months | 6.41% | 3.18% | 5.55% |
| 6 months | 15.94% | 13.85% | 15.94% |
| YTD | 22.73% | 14.84% | 19.06% |
| 1 year | 35.88% | 25.04% | 31.36% |
| 3 years | 170.73% | 94.66% | 150.68% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHS vs FEN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHS (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHS leads in 8 and FEN leads in 2. CHS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; FEN is a Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CHS leads (0.29% vs 0.14%). 1 week: CHS leads (0.45% vs 0.11%). 1 month: FEN leads (0.41% vs 0.03%). 3 months: CHS leads (6.41% vs 3.18%). 6 months: CHS leads (15.94% vs 13.85%). YTD: CHS leads (22.73% vs 14.84%). 1 year: CHS leads (35.88% vs 25.04%). 3 years: CHS leads (170.73% vs 94.66%). Size (TRY): CHS leads (171.4M vs 48M). Investors: FEN leads (6,063 vs 3,073).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHS or FEN?
Year to date CHS returned 22.73% and FEN returned 14.84%; over the last year CHS returned 35.88% and FEN returned 25.04%. Over the last month CHS returned 0.03% and FEN returned 0.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHS or FEN?
As of September 28, 2026, CHS has a size of TRY 171.4M with 3,073 investors, while FEN has a size of TRY 48M with 6,063 investors. CHS leads in size and FEN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHS and FEN mean?
The CMB risk score of CHS is 4 out of 7 and that of FEN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.