Yatırımcı.AI

ANG vs FEN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANG (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ANGFEN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANG vs FEN Fund Comparison
MetricANGFENCategory median
Daily0.16%0.14%0.26%
1 week0.38%0.11%0.48%
1 month−0.31%0.41%0.23%
3 months6.02%3.18%5.55%
6 months18.35%13.85%15.94%
YTD20.15%14.84%19.06%
1 year28.71%25.04%31.36%
3 years120.60%94.66%150.68%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANG vs FEN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANG (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FEN (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANG leads in 9 and FEN leads in 1. ANG is a Standard Fund fund managed by Vıennalıfe Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; FEN is a Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ANG leads (0.16% vs 0.14%). 1 week: ANG leads (0.38% vs 0.11%). 1 month: FEN leads (0.41% vs −0.31%). 3 months: ANG leads (6.02% vs 3.18%). 6 months: ANG leads (18.35% vs 13.85%). YTD: ANG leads (20.15% vs 14.84%). 1 year: ANG leads (28.71% vs 25.04%). 3 years: ANG leads (120.60% vs 94.66%). Size (TRY): ANG leads (139.7M vs 48M). Investors: ANG leads (33,249 vs 6,063).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANG returned 20.15% and FEN returned 14.84%; over the last year ANG returned 28.71% and FEN returned 25.04%. Over the last month ANG returned −0.31% and FEN returned 0.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ANG has a size of TRY 139.7M with 33,249 investors, while FEN has a size of TRY 48M with 6,063 investors. ANG leads in size and ANG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANG is 4 out of 7 and that of FEN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.