EPP vs ZMT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPP (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EPP | ZMT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.51% | 0.08% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | 1.02% | 0.69% |
| 1 month | 2.98% | 2.78% | 2.03% |
| 3 months | 9.85% | 2.94% | 3.24% |
| 6 months | 21.61% | 8.46% | 8.32% |
| YTD | 39.53% | 15.64% | 17.50% |
| 1 year | 47.14% | 20.55% | 21.40% |
| 3 years | — | 111.02% | 105.67% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EPP vs ZMT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EPP (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 11, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPP leads in 6 and ZMT leads in 3. EPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZMT leads (0.51% vs 0.10%). 1 week: ZMT leads (1.02% vs 0.69%). 1 month: EPP leads (2.98% vs 2.78%). 3 months: EPP leads (9.85% vs 2.94%). 6 months: EPP leads (21.61% vs 8.46%). YTD: EPP leads (39.53% vs 15.64%). 1 year: EPP leads (47.14% vs 20.55%). Size (TRY): EPP leads (1.7B vs 1.6B). Investors: ZMT leads (224 vs 48).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EPP or ZMT?
Year to date EPP returned 39.53% and ZMT returned 15.64%; over the last year EPP returned 47.14% and ZMT returned 20.55%. Over the last month EPP returned 2.98% and ZMT returned 2.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EPP or ZMT?
As of November 11, 2026, EPP has a size of TRY 1.7B with 48 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 224 investors. EPP leads in size and ZMT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EPP and ZMT mean?
The CMB risk score of EPP is 2 out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.