Yatırımcı.AI

ACU vs ZMT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

ACUZMT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ACU vs ZMT Fund Comparison
MetricACUZMTCategory median
Daily0.07%−0.01%0.01%
1 week0.53%0.49%0.30%
1 month2.08%−0.12%0.00%
3 months6.49%4.19%3.96%
6 months13.19%7.48%8.18%
YTD20.23%13.89%15.73%
1 year24.55%19.18%20.69%
3 years113.71%113.95%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ACU vs ZMT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ACU leads in 7 and ZMT leads in 3. ACU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ACU leads (0.07% vs −0.01%). 1 week: ACU leads (0.53% vs 0.49%). 1 month: ACU leads (2.08% vs −0.12%). 3 months: ACU leads (6.49% vs 4.19%). 6 months: ACU leads (13.19% vs 7.48%). YTD: ACU leads (20.23% vs 13.89%). 1 year: ACU leads (24.55% vs 19.18%). 3 years: ZMT leads (113.95% vs 113.71%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: ZMT leads (228 vs 113).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ACU returned 20.23% and ZMT returned 13.89%; over the last year ACU returned 24.55% and ZMT returned 19.18%. Over the last month ACU returned 2.08% and ZMT returned −0.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, ACU has a size of TRY 1.5B with 113 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 228 investors. ZMT leads in size and ZMT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ACU is 5 out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.