Yatırımcı.AI

EPK vs RZN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPK (Emaa Blue Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and RZN (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

EPKRZN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EPK vs RZN Fund Comparison
MetricEPKRZNCategory median
Daily−3.45%0.08%−0.81%
1 week−5.33%0.52%−1.35%
1 month−7.93%2.84%−1.46%
3 months6.80%7.52%5.43%
6 months−2.92%16.44%13.12%
YTD−2.02%21.65%21.52%
1 year—36.14%34.01%
3 years—207.48%172.01%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EPK vs RZN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EPK (Emaa Blue Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and RZN (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPK leads in 0 and RZN leads in 9. EPK is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RZN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RZN leads (0.08% vs −3.45%). 1 week: RZN leads (0.52% vs −5.33%). 1 month: RZN leads (2.84% vs −7.93%). 3 months: RZN leads (7.52% vs 6.80%). 6 months: RZN leads (16.44% vs −2.92%). YTD: RZN leads (21.65% vs −2.02%). Size (TRY): RZN leads (215.6M vs 205.3M). Investors: RZN leads (4,853 vs 1,234). Risk: RZN leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EPK returned −2.02% and RZN returned 21.65%; over the last year EPK returned — and RZN returned 36.14%. Over the last month EPK returned −7.93% and RZN returned 2.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, EPK has a size of TRY 205.3M with 1,234 investors, while RZN has a size of TRY 215.6M with 4,853 investors. RZN leads in size and RZN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EPK is 6 out of 7 and that of RZN is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.