Yatırımcı.AI

EPK vs OFS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPK (Emaa Blue Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OFS (Oyak Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

EPKOFS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EPK vs OFS Fund Comparison
MetricEPKOFSCategory median
Daily−3.45%−0.93%−0.81%
1 week−5.33%−1.32%−1.35%
1 month−7.93%−0.63%−1.46%
3 months6.80%6.88%5.43%
6 months−2.92%13.06%13.12%
YTD−2.02%19.29%21.52%
1 year—31.28%34.01%
3 years—169.53%172.01%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EPK vs OFS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EPK (Emaa Blue Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OFS (Oyak Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPK leads in 2 and OFS leads in 7. EPK is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OFS leads (−0.93% vs −3.45%). 1 week: OFS leads (−1.32% vs −5.33%). 1 month: OFS leads (−0.63% vs −7.93%). 3 months: OFS leads (6.88% vs 6.80%). 6 months: OFS leads (13.06% vs −2.92%). YTD: OFS leads (19.29% vs −2.02%). Size (TRY): EPK leads (205.3M vs 185.3M). Investors: EPK leads (1,234 vs 396). Risk: OFS leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EPK returned −2.02% and OFS returned 19.29%; over the last year EPK returned — and OFS returned 31.28%. Over the last month EPK returned −7.93% and OFS returned −0.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, EPK has a size of TRY 205.3M with 1,234 investors, while OFS has a size of TRY 185.3M with 396 investors. EPK leads in size and EPK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EPK is 6 out of 7 and that of OFS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.