EML vs OBP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and OBP (Oyak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EML | OBP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 1.22% | 1.03% |
| Daily | −0.12% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| 1 week | 1.32% | 1.15% | 0.83% |
| 1 month | 2.24% | 1.30% | −1.16% |
| 3 months | −1.59% | 5.07% | −0.11% |
| 6 months | 0.23% | 11.79% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 24.13% | 24.23% | 22.14% |
| 1 year | — | 35.30% | 29.37% |
| 3 years | — | 173.20% | 154.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EML vs OBP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and OBP (Oyak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EML leads in 4 and OBP leads in 4. EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OBP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: OBP leads (0.01% vs −0.12%). 1 week: EML leads (1.32% vs 1.15%). 1 month: EML leads (2.24% vs 1.30%). 3 months: OBP leads (5.07% vs −1.59%). 6 months: OBP leads (11.79% vs 0.23%). YTD: OBP leads (24.23% vs 24.13%). Size (TRY): EML leads (33.8M vs 31M). Investors: EML leads (787 vs 761).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EML or OBP?
Year to date EML returned 24.13% and OBP returned 24.23%; over the last year EML returned — and OBP returned 35.30%. Over the last month EML returned 2.24% and OBP returned 1.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EML or OBP?
As of November 12, 2026, EML has a size of TRY 33.8M with 787 investors, while OBP has a size of TRY 31M with 761 investors. EML leads in size and EML leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EML and OBP mean?
The CMB risk score of EML is 4 out of 7 and that of OBP is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.