EDT vs RS1 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EDT | RS1 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.11% | 0.10% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.72% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 3.20% | 3.38% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.97% | 10.29% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 21.13% | 21.89% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 32.16% | 33.89% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 45.49% | 48.33% | 21.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EDT vs RS1 Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EDT leads in 2 and RS1 leads in 7. EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RS1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EDT leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: RS1 leads (0.72% vs 0.68%). 1 month: RS1 leads (3.38% vs 3.20%). 3 months: RS1 leads (10.29% vs 9.97%). 6 months: RS1 leads (21.89% vs 21.13%). YTD: RS1 leads (33.89% vs 32.16%). 1 year: RS1 leads (48.33% vs 45.49%). Size (TRY): RS1 leads (999.5M vs 953.1M). Investors: EDT leads (576 vs 124).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EDT or RS1?
Year to date EDT returned 32.16% and RS1 returned 33.89%; over the last year EDT returned 45.49% and RS1 returned 48.33%. Over the last month EDT returned 3.20% and RS1 returned 3.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EDT or RS1?
As of September 29, 2026, EDT has a size of TRY 953.1M with 576 investors, while RS1 has a size of TRY 999.5M with 124 investors. RS1 leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EDT and RS1 mean?
The CMB risk score of EDT is 2 out of 7 and that of RS1 is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.