EDT vs RRA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EDT | RRA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 3.08% | 3.10% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.84% | 9.65% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 21.37% | 21.74% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 31.75% | 33.30% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 45.33% | 48.13% | 24.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EDT vs RRA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EDT leads in 3 and RRA leads in 6. EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; RRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RRA leads (0.32% vs 0.27%). 1 week: RRA leads (0.72% vs 0.68%). 1 month: RRA leads (3.10% vs 3.08%). 3 months: EDT leads (9.84% vs 9.65%). 6 months: RRA leads (21.74% vs 21.37%). YTD: RRA leads (33.30% vs 31.75%). 1 year: RRA leads (48.13% vs 45.33%). Size (TRY): EDT leads (953.3M vs 952.3M). Investors: EDT leads (577 vs 129).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EDT or RRA?
Year to date EDT returned 31.75% and RRA returned 33.30%; over the last year EDT returned 45.33% and RRA returned 48.13%. Over the last month EDT returned 3.08% and RRA returned 3.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EDT or RRA?
As of September 28, 2026, EDT has a size of TRY 953.3M with 577 investors, while RRA has a size of TRY 952.3M with 129 investors. EDT leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EDT and RRA mean?
The CMB risk score of EDT is 2 out of 7 and that of RRA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.