EDT vs NUB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and NUB (Nurol Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EDT | NUB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.59% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.92% | −0.18% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.64% | 4.27% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 20.99% | 7.20% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 35.24% | 13.09% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 45.10% | 18.14% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EDT vs NUB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and NUB (Nurol Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EDT leads in 9 and NUB leads in 0. EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NUB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EDT leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: EDT leads (0.67% vs 0.59%). 1 month: EDT leads (2.92% vs −0.18%). 3 months: EDT leads (9.64% vs 4.27%). 6 months: EDT leads (20.99% vs 7.20%). YTD: EDT leads (35.24% vs 13.09%). 1 year: EDT leads (45.10% vs 18.14%). Size (TRY): EDT leads (951.5M vs 891.1M). Investors: EDT leads (542 vs 498).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EDT or NUB?
Year to date EDT returned 35.24% and NUB returned 13.09%; over the last year EDT returned 45.10% and NUB returned 18.14%. Over the last month EDT returned 2.92% and NUB returned −0.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EDT or NUB?
As of October 23, 2026, EDT has a size of TRY 951.5M with 542 investors, while NUB has a size of TRY 891.1M with 498 investors. EDT leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EDT and NUB mean?
The CMB risk score of EDT is 2 out of 7 and that of NUB is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.