EDP vs FMV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and FMV (Deniz Portföy FMV Işık Üniversitesi Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EDP | FMV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.64% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 2.80% | 2.86% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 9.96% | 9.64% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 21.57% | 20.75% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 24.10% | 34.80% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | — | 44.92% | 20.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EDP vs FMV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and FMV (Deniz Portföy FMV Işık Üniversitesi Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EDP leads in 4 and FMV leads in 4. EDP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FMV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FMV leads (0.09% vs 0.09%). 1 week: FMV leads (0.66% vs 0.64%). 1 month: FMV leads (2.86% vs 2.80%). 3 months: EDP leads (9.96% vs 9.64%). 6 months: EDP leads (21.57% vs 20.75%). YTD: FMV leads (34.80% vs 24.10%). Size (TRY): EDP leads (187.6M vs 175.9M). Investors: EDP leads (63 vs 37).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EDP or FMV?
Year to date EDP returned 24.10% and FMV returned 34.80%; over the last year EDP returned — and FMV returned 44.92%. Over the last month EDP returned 2.80% and FMV returned 2.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EDP or FMV?
As of October 22, 2026, EDP has a size of TRY 187.6M with 63 investors, while FMV has a size of TRY 175.9M with 37 investors. EDP leads in size and EDP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EDP and FMV mean?
The CMB risk score of EDP is 2 out of 7 and that of FMV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.