Yatırımcı.AI

ECA vs KUB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KUB (Kare Portföy Değişken (Döviz) Fonu) side by side.

ECAKUB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ECA vs KUB Fund Comparison
MetricECAKUBCategory median
Today (est.)−1.31%—−0.24%
Daily1.15%0.83%1.07%
1 week4.24%−0.89%2.38%
1 month−5.84%−0.89%−0.76%
3 months−3.57%2.70%0.00%
6 months9.86%6.73%0.00%
YTD37.98%13.09%22.39%
1 year50.34%16.61%28.39%
3 years163.07%140.33%154.30%
Returns are based on prices as of November 10, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 10, 2026, 18:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ECA vs KUB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KUB (Kare Portföy Değişken (Döviz) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ECA leads in 6 and KUB leads in 4. ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KUB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ECA leads (1.15% vs 0.83%). 1 week: ECA leads (4.24% vs −0.89%). 1 month: KUB leads (−0.89% vs −5.84%). 3 months: KUB leads (2.70% vs −3.57%). 6 months: ECA leads (9.86% vs 6.73%). YTD: ECA leads (37.98% vs 13.09%). 1 year: ECA leads (50.34% vs 16.61%). 3 years: ECA leads (163.07% vs 140.33%). Size (TRY): KUB leads (259.2M vs 250.2M). Investors: KUB leads (2,930 vs 680).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ECA returned 37.98% and KUB returned 13.09%; over the last year ECA returned 50.34% and KUB returned 16.61%. Over the last month ECA returned −5.84% and KUB returned −0.89%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 10, 2026, ECA has a size of TRY 250.2M with 680 investors, while KUB has a size of TRY 259.2M with 2,930 investors. KUB leads in size and KUB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ECA is 6 out of 7 and that of KUB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.