Yatırımcı.AI

KET vs KUB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KUB (Kare Portföy Değişken (Döviz) Fonu) side by side.

KETKUB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KET vs KUB Fund Comparison
MetricKETKUBCategory median
Daily0.73%0.83%1.07%
1 week3.09%−0.89%2.38%
1 month−1.67%−0.89%−0.76%
3 months1.46%2.70%0.00%
6 months5.72%6.73%0.00%
YTD36.10%13.09%22.39%
1 year43.17%16.61%28.39%
3 years183.81%140.33%154.30%
Returns are based on prices as of November 10, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KET vs KUB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KUB (Kare Portföy Değişken (Döviz) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KET leads in 5 and KUB leads in 6. KET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; KUB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KUB leads (0.83% vs 0.73%). 1 week: KET leads (3.09% vs −0.89%). 1 month: KUB leads (−0.89% vs −1.67%). 3 months: KUB leads (2.70% vs 1.46%). 6 months: KUB leads (6.73% vs 5.72%). YTD: KET leads (36.10% vs 13.09%). 1 year: KET leads (43.17% vs 16.61%). 3 years: KET leads (183.81% vs 140.33%). Size (TRY): KUB leads (259.2M vs 258.7M). Investors: KUB leads (2,930 vs 2,764). Risk: KET leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KET returned 36.10% and KUB returned 13.09%; over the last year KET returned 43.17% and KUB returned 16.61%. Over the last month KET returned −1.67% and KUB returned −0.89%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 10, 2026, KET has a size of TRY 258.7M with 2,764 investors, while KUB has a size of TRY 259.2M with 2,930 investors. KUB leads in size and KUB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KET is 4 out of 7 and that of KUB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.