EBS vs NLK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EBS | NLK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.02% | 0.10% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.40% | 0.52% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 2.50% | 2.94% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 5.66% | 9.66% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 12.43% | 21.42% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 19.92% | 40.37% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 23.50% | 48.15% | 21.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EBS vs NLK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EBS leads in 1 and NLK leads in 8. EBS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NLK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NLK leads (0.10% vs −0.02%). 1 week: NLK leads (0.52% vs 0.40%). 1 month: NLK leads (2.94% vs 2.50%). 3 months: NLK leads (9.66% vs 5.66%). 6 months: NLK leads (21.42% vs 12.43%). YTD: NLK leads (40.37% vs 19.92%). 1 year: NLK leads (48.15% vs 23.50%). Size (TRY): EBS leads (5B vs 5B). Investors: NLK leads (756 vs 23).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EBS or NLK?
Year to date EBS returned 19.92% and NLK returned 40.37%; over the last year EBS returned 23.50% and NLK returned 48.15%. Over the last month EBS returned 2.50% and NLK returned 2.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EBS or NLK?
As of November 13, 2026, EBS has a size of TRY 5B with 23 investors, while NLK has a size of TRY 5B with 756 investors. EBS leads in size and NLK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EBS and NLK mean?
The CMB risk score of EBS is — out of 7 and that of NLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.