Yatırımcı.AI

EBD vs YLC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBD (Global MD Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) side by side.

EBDYLC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EBD vs YLC Fund Comparison
MetricEBDYLCCategory median
Daily−1.03%−0.16%−0.83%
1 week−0.98%−1.70%−0.98%
1 month2.02%−4.02%−1.82%
3 months−3.16%2.69%3.78%
6 months29.20%7.27%14.04%
YTD41.19%24.52%24.40%
1 year58.30%30.90%34.17%
3 years190.53%75.91%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EBD vs YLC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EBD (Global MD Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EBD leads in 7 and YLC leads in 3. EBD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YLC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YLC leads (−0.16% vs −1.03%). 1 week: EBD leads (−0.98% vs −1.70%). 1 month: EBD leads (2.02% vs −4.02%). 3 months: YLC leads (2.69% vs −3.16%). 6 months: EBD leads (29.20% vs 7.27%). YTD: EBD leads (41.19% vs 24.52%). 1 year: EBD leads (58.30% vs 30.90%). 3 years: EBD leads (190.53% vs 75.91%). Size (TRY): EBD leads (74.5M vs 71M). Investors: YLC leads (1,213 vs 514).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EBD returned 41.19% and YLC returned 24.52%; over the last year EBD returned 58.30% and YLC returned 30.90%. Over the last month EBD returned 2.02% and YLC returned −4.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, EBD has a size of TRY 74.5M with 514 investors, while YLC has a size of TRY 71M with 1,213 investors. EBD leads in size and YLC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EBD is — out of 7 and that of YLC is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.