Yatırımcı.AI

EBD vs MTX Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBD (Global MD Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and MTX (TEB Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) side by side.

EBDMTX
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EBD vs MTX Fund Comparison
MetricEBDMTXCategory median
Daily−0.62%0.40%0.21%
1 week0.11%0.99%1.17%
1 month−4.69%−6.99%−0.49%
3 months−4.16%−8.63%−0.87%
6 months−1.60%−5.47%0.68%
YTD34.10%7.88%22.53%
1 year48.25%9.34%29.33%
3 years170.14%163.13%156.25%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EBD vs MTX Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EBD (Global MD Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and MTX (TEB Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EBD leads in 7 and MTX leads in 3. EBD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MTX is a Variable Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MTX leads (0.40% vs −0.62%). 1 week: MTX leads (0.99% vs 0.11%). 1 month: EBD leads (−4.69% vs −6.99%). 3 months: EBD leads (−4.16% vs −8.63%). 6 months: EBD leads (−1.60% vs −5.47%). YTD: EBD leads (34.10% vs 7.88%). 1 year: EBD leads (48.25% vs 9.34%). 3 years: EBD leads (170.14% vs 163.13%). Size (TRY): EBD leads (66.2M vs 65.3M). Investors: MTX leads (1,821 vs 478).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EBD returned 34.10% and MTX returned 7.88%; over the last year EBD returned 48.25% and MTX returned 9.34%. Over the last month EBD returned −4.69% and MTX returned −6.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, EBD has a size of TRY 66.2M with 478 investors, while MTX has a size of TRY 65.3M with 1,821 investors. EBD leads in size and MTX leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EBD is — out of 7 and that of MTX is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.